You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results

2268 items matching your search terms

  1. HX v NM [2022] NZDT 206 (25 November 2022) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Negligence / Applicant and Respondent are neighbours and share a driveway / Respondent bought new subdivision and engaged construction company to build new house / Applicant states that heavy trucks damaged water pipes and caused cracks in his driveway / Applicant claimed $4,062.95 for driveway repairs and $1,550 for water bills from cracked water pipes / Held: Respondent not liable in negligence to Applicant for any actions or omissions of contractors working on his new house / No remedy available to the applicant / Claim dismissed.

  2. W Ltd v NC [2022] NZDT 210 (24 November 2022) [PDF, 99 KB]

    Negligence / Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 / Applicant was towing a trailer / Respondent was following Applicant / Applicant and Respondent collided / Applicant claimed she indicated to turn, however had disconnected the plug between her car and trailer lights / Respondent did not see the indicator or brake lights / Respondent insurer claimed $18,203.62 for the cost of repairing Applicant's vehicle / Held: not being able to see the brake lights and indicator on the trailer was a major contributing factor to collision / Applicant should have used a hand signal to show she was turning / Applicant must bear the majority of the costs according to their respective contribution being 75:25 / Applicant ordered to Respondent's insurance company $13,650.00 / Claim granted in part.

  3. FQ v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 248 (24 November 2022) [PDF, 103 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased caravan from Respondent / Applicant contracted with Respondent to deliver caravan / Delivery costs was $4,000.00 / Caravan had insect infestation / Applicant attempted to clean up infestation / Respondent assisted with insect cleaning / Applicant asked for refund / Respondent agreed conditional upon Applicant returning caravan / Cost of return was $6,000.00 / Applicant claimed supplied goods not up to standard / Applicant sought delivery costs and return total $10,000.00 / Held: Respondent supplied goods that were not up to standard / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $10,000.00 / Applicant to return caravan to Respondent / Claim granted.

  4. SX v SD Ltd [2022] NZDT 208 (24 November 2022) [PDF, 94 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant rented a brand new cabin from Respondent / Applicant reported a chemical smell in the cabin which made her unwell / Applicant requested an older cabin / Respondent agreed but said it would incur an additional collection and delivery cost / Applicant then cancelled the contract / Applicant claimed $1,125.75 for bond, rent, collection and delivery fee / Whether cabin was fit for purpose / Held: Applicant had a sensitivity to chemicals used in the construction process / Not reasonable for the Respondent to decline her request for a replacement cabin at no extra charge / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $600.00 for bond refund, the final weeks rent and the collection component of the delivery fee / Claim granted in part.

  5. MO & HD v IE Ltd [2022] NZDT 285 (23 November 2022) [PDF, 154 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant engaged Respondent to provide design services for construction of new house / Respondent not able to complete work within Applicant’s budget / Applicant requested refund and claimed $18,525 / Held: Respondents communication to Applicant that it would not be able to build design produced within budget represented failure of reasonable care and skill / Cancellation of contract justified and an available remedy / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $7,043.75 / Claim allowed in part.

  6. VN v SC Ltd [2022] NZDT 240 (23 November 2022) [PDF, 102 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2007 / Applicant contracted Respondent to build deck / The agreement was to pay 25% of contract price before works commence, another 25% once work has started and 50% after work is completed / Respondent asked for advance payment to acquire materials / Applicant paid a total of $7,500 / Respondent did not complete build / Applicant claims $6,000 refund / Held: The contract terms were that the Applicant would pay 25% before and during the construction of the deck and 50% after completion / Respondent did not complete its obligations to Applicant / Respondent to pay $6,000 to Applicant / Claim allowed.

  7. IX v HG [2022] NZDT 224 (23 November 2022) [PDF, 91 KB]

    Negligence / Respondent kicked in panels on Applicant’s car / Respondent also filled Applicant's petrol vehicle up with diesel / Applicant claimed compensation for the costs of repairing the petrol tank and panels / Applicant's car subsequently stolen / Held: Applicant's car was stolen and there is therefore no hope of it ever being repaired / It would be artificial to award Applicant compensation for repairs which will never be done / Claim dismissed.

  8. BC v ND [2022] NZDT 207 (23 November 2022) [PDF, 107 KB]

    Contract / Applicants' late uncle entered private loan agreement with Respondent / Respondent paid two repayments of $1,000 each / Outstanding balance of $9,000 agreed to be paid in full by due date / Respondent did not pay after Applicants' uncle passed away / Applicants claim outstanding balance plus interest / Held: Respondent liable to pay outstanding balance with interest / Claim allowed / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $9,439.51.

  9. TQ v ON [2022] NZDT 242 (21 November 2022) [PDF, 144 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Respondent sold a car to Applicant for $4,500.00 / Motor vehicle described as reliable in ad / Applicant took car to get Warrant of Fitness / Applicant advised car not worth repairing / Applicant claimed Respondent misrepresented car's condition / Respondent claimed car was sold as is where is / Applicant claimed $3,800.00 / Held: Respondent knew something was wrong with car / Respondent represented the car in ad as reliable / Applicant was a minor at time of purchase / Contract not fair and reasonable and cannot be enforced / Respondent ordered to pay $3,800.00 in exchange for the return of the car / Claim granted. 

  10. SU v WC [2022] NZDT 215 (21 November 2022) [PDF, 110 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) / Applicant contracted Respondent to perform construction work / Applicant claims work done by Respondent was not undertaken with due care and skill, as laid out in the CGA, and claims $2,755.32 in compensation / Held: Respondent did not undertake work with requisite care and skill / evidence that tools were not suitable for the work / Respondent to pay Applicant compensation of $2,755.32 / Claim granted.

  11. WC & SD v CT Ltd [2022] NZDT 198 (21 November 2022) [PDF, 203 KB]

    Contract / Applicants contracted the Respondent to cater their wedding / Applicants paid a thirty percent deposit on quoted price of $3325 / Wedding postponed due to Covid restrictions / Respondent agreed to change wedding date / Applicants unsuccessfully attempted to contact the Respondent regarding the catering closer to the date / Eventually Respondent advised that he had retired due to Covid difficulties / Applicants advised Respondent that they wished to cancel the contract and obtain a refund / Whether the Applicants were entitled to a refund / Held: amount paid by the Applicants was more than a reasonable deposit / Applicants not advised of any specific cancellation terms and conditions / Applicants experienced difficulties communicating with the Respondent / Respondent ordered to pay $997.50 / Claim granted.

  12. H Ltd v HF & OF [2022] NZDT 217 (16 November 2022) [PDF, 208 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant entered into contract with Respondent to provide price estimate for reclad of Respondent's property / Applicant claimed work has been completed and Respondent had not paid final invoice / Respondent claimed Applicant failed to provide services with reasonable care and skill / Applicant claimed $17,391.39 for outstanding invoice and legal costs / Held: Respondents failed to prove on balance of probabilities that work completed was in breach of statutory guarantees / Respondents breached second agreement by failing to pay invoices / Applicant not entitled to award of legal costs / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $14,293.58 / Claim allowed in part.

  13. KJ v OU Ltd [2022] NZDT 216 (16 November 2022) [PDF, 115 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) / Respondent manufactured and fitted towbar to Applicant's motorhome / Applicant subsequently used towbar for trailer and bike rack that came lose while driving causing damage / Applicant claims Respondent did not fit towbar with reasonable care and skill and it was not fit for purpose, CGA ss 28, 29 / Held: towbar was not fitted with reasonable care and skill and was not fit for purpose / Respondent to pay Applicant $1,364.00 compensation for damage / Claim granted.

  14. IN v FQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 196 (15 November 2022) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased a bed from the Respondent / Applicant immediately complained about a strong odour from the bedhead / Applicant placed bed in storage / Applicant requested a bed replacement from the Respondent twenty months later / Whether the Applicant was out of time to reject the bed / Held: Applicant failed to reject the bed in a reasonable time / Twenty months delay was not reasonable / Claim dismissed.

  15. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [PDF, 106 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) / Applicant purchased smart watch from Respondent / After 3 or more years applicant noticed part of the watch had fallen off / Watch could not be worn or used for swimming due to missing part / Applicant claims watch was not fit for purpose under section 7 of the CGA / Applicant claims watch was also non-compliant with sections 6 and 8 of the CGA / Respondent claims goods were fit for purpose for the warrantable period (2 years) / Held: watch was fit for purpose / reasonable consumer would not expect a smart watch to retain all characteristics and functionality after 3 years / Claim dismissed.

  16. UV Ltd v MB Ltd [2023] NZDT 81 (11 November 2022) [PDF, 221 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant ordered T-shirts and basketballs singlets with printed branding from Respondent / Applicant’s client rejected the garments due to printing issues / Applicant refunded client / Applicant seeks full refund for amount paid, $5,209.82 and declaration they are not liable for a further invoice of $1,115.84 / Respondent claims printing issue caused by incorrect washing of garments by client / Held: Respondent breached implied conditions in ss138 and 139 of the CCLA as garments supplied were not fit for purpose / Applicant entitled to full refund of the price paid for the goods / Applicant is not liable to pay the remaining invoice / Applicant  is to make the garments available for collection by the Respondent within 7 days of receipt of payment of $5,209.82 / Claim granted.

  17. EB & KB v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 288 (11 November 2022) [PDF, 210 KB]

    Contract / Respondents were the former property manager for Applicants / Applicants are unhappy with services provided in two tenancies / Applicants claim $4870 from respondent for various cleaning fees, repair and replacement fees, and for rent forgone after termination of second tenancy and 50% refund of management fees / Claim partially allowed for cleaning fees, replacement fees, and for one day’s rent missed when first tenancy ended, Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $169.28 total.

  18. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [PDF, 101 KB]

    Contract / Applicant provided trucking and various construction services to Respondent / Respondent declined to make payment on basis that Applicant's invoices do not match Respondent's site records / Applicant claims outstanding invoiced balance $8,981.50 / Held: Applicant provided all services invoiced and entire outstanding balance plus interest is payable by Respondent / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $9,152.91 / claim allowed.

  19. BD v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 232 (10 November 2022) [PDF, 179 KB]

    Contract / Applicant’s car was stolen from a park / Applicant left her car keys in the ignition when she urgently needed to use nearby public toilets / When the Applicant left the toilets her car had been stolen / Applicant sought payment under a motor vehicle payment that she had with the Respondent / Dispute over whether the vehicle was left unattended / Held: no reasonable legal basis to find the Respondent had a contractual obligation to settle the claim / Claim dismissed.

  20. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Negligence / Contributory Negligence Act 1947 (CNA) / Applicant dug hole during course of their work and damaged underground cables belonging to Respondent / Respondent issued invoice for $2,499.42 / Applicant claims for declaration of non-liability / Applicant claims they were not responsible for damage / Respondent counterclaims Applicant was negligent and caused damage to cables / Respondent counterclaims $2,499.42 in damages / Held: Tribunal is unable to rule on non-liability in tort / Held: Applicant partially responsible for damage under CNA / Respondent contributed to damage by only burying cables 150mm deep / Applicant to pay Respondent $999.77, being 40% of damages / Claim dismissed / Counterclaim partially upheld.

  21. I Ltd v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 282 (7 November 2022) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Contract / Applicant’s interested in Respondent’s truck / Applicant’s cousin viewed truck / Applicant paid deposit / Applicant viewed truck but decided on a different truck / Applicant later decided he didn’t want the truck / Respondent refunded Applicant some of deposit / Applicant claims $1,500 as refund of balance of deposit plus filing fee / Held: there was a contract for sale and purchase of the truck / Contract included binding term that Respondent able to retain deposit if sale did not proceed / Contract and exercise contractual term not harsh and unconscionable, claim dismissed

  22. HL & NL v FL [2022] NZDT 280 (7 November 2022) [PDF, 292 KB]

    Property / Applicant and Respondent are family members involved in partnership that operated farm / Partnership dissolved in acrimonious circumstances / Applicant claims personal and partnership property remaining at farm after dissolution / Held: various chattels in dispute considered individually by Disputes Tribunal / Respondent's representative to collect two trailers and plumbing connections from Applicant / Respondent's representative to make available for collection any items listed as "A" in bundle of evidence / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,125 / claim allowed.

  23. MN v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 281 (4 November 2022) [PDF, 192 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant took car to Respondent’s car wash / Soap suds were sprayed on car then carwash stopped working / Employee of Respondent washed off some suds / Applicant drove home and tried to hose off remaining suds / Sud marks left on car / Applicant claims for consequential damage caused by malfunction of the carwash / Held: damage caused by carwash malfunction / Applicant entitled to compensation / Respondent liable to pay $3,653.53 for cost of remedying damage, claim allowed